New FDA Policies Shape Pharma Development and Production
Washington Report
New FDA Policies Shape Pharma
Development and Production - continued
Risks and research
Efforts to increase FDA oversight of pharmacy compounding are one of
many issues that involve the development and proper use of safe
medications. FDA is working to address these concerns on several
fronts, as seen in a number of documents and programs recently unveiled.
Final
guidance on minimizing drug risk. FDA issued three final
guidances in March designed to improve data collection on drug safety
before approval, to enhance post-
approval adverse event tracking, and to enhance the safe use of
medications on the market. These documents finalize draft proposals
that were debated and revised over three years and support broader
agency efforts to ensure drug safety.
Although the guidances focus on clinical trial design and postmarket
risk management, they present many issues important to pharmaceutical
manufacturers. The guidance on premarket risk assessment outlines
additional testing and study approaches likely to enhance a sponsor’s
understanding of product safety concerns. Its recommendations could
affect demand for clinical supplies and encourage expanded clinical
assessment of proposed packaging and product design to minimize the
potential for medication errors.
Another guidance describes the development and use of risk minimization
action plans (RiskMAPs) to ensure that patients safely use certain
high-risk products. RiskMAPs could include special educational
programs, reminder systems, and limited access controls. Although FDA
emphasized that only a limited number of products will warrant such
efforts, the agency also notes that it has the authority to require
product recalls, safety alerts, and enforcement procedures such as
seizures or injunctions to prevent the possibility of serious risks to
the public health if risk minimization efforts fail.
A third guidance presents approaches for manufacturers to establish
good pharmaco-vigilance programs for marketed drugs. In outlining
strategies for identifying and analyzing safety signals, FDA recommends
that manufacturers also investigate signs of confusion about a
product’s name, labeling, packaging, or use. The guidances are
available at www.fda.gov/cder/guidance.
Submitting
pharmacogenomic data. Another final guidance spells out how
manufacturers should provide genomic data to the agency, either as part
of a market application or through a new voluntary process. FDA aims to
encourage pharmacogenomic research leading to more personalized
medicine and notes that voluntary data submissions can help both
regulatory and industry scientists keep abreast of new developments in
this area.
FDA encourages manufacturers to meet informally with agency staffers to
discuss ways to use innovative genetic and genomic information, and
assures industry that voluntary genomic data submissions will not
affect the review and oversight of formal applications for new drugs.
Instead, a new interdisciplinary pharmacogenomics review group will
examine voluntary data submissions separately from the application
review process.
The guidance explains that it addresses only pharmacogenomics data
related to ensuring appropriate clinical testing and use of certain
drugs—and not genetic or genomic techniques for biological product
characterization or quality control, a topic that FDA plans to address
in future guidance documents. The pharmacogenomics guidance, along with
additional information for submitting data to FDA and FDA’s assessment
process, is available at www.fda.gov/cder/genomics/default.htm.
Although the guidance emphasizes that broader assessment of
pharmacogenomics data offers potential benefits in clinical trial
design and drug development, the advent of more individualized
medicines may bring significant changes to the drug industry. A report
from PriceWaterhouseCoopers entitled, Personalized
Medicine: The Emerging Pharmacogenomics Revolution
predicts an erosion over time of the current blockbuster business
model, a development that offers significant opportunities to smaller
life sciences companies. Initial pharmacogenomic breakthroughs are most
likely to occur in oncology, and developing and launching new drugs in
this area will require further changes in regulatory and clinical
practices to incorporate genetic testing as part of patient diagnosis
and treatment. PT