Considerations for Outsourcing Laboratory Equipment Maintenance
Feature
Considerations for Outsourcing Laboratory Equipment Maintenance (continued)
Equipment triage
Each of the models previously described offers cost and service level
benefits. One current industry trend sees the asset management,
frontline, and on-site models merging into a single combined triage
model (see Figure 2). The model can work independently of in-house
maintenance groups or in conjunction with in-house maintenance groups
as required. This model consolidates all laboratory equipment
maintenance under one overall provider with one contract and one
invoice point.
An on-site engineer team directly maintains the most prevalent,
mission-critical equipment to provide the highest service level and the
biggest cost savings. Less prevalent equipment is maintained by
managing the OEM on a call-out time-and-materials basis or by procuring
a contract from the OEM. The exact split between direct maintenance and
OEM management is derived by understanding the needs and concerns of
scientists and balancing those needs against the speed with which the
company wishes to make cost savings. In some cases, the on-site team
may be initially restricted to one or two technologies or to a
restricted number of cost centers to prove the viability of the model.
Maintenance events and transactions for all equipment are recorded in
the same information technology management system, providing
comprehensive asset management capabilities and service-quality
performance monitoring regardless of whether the equipment is
maintained by an on-site engineer or external OEM.
Irrespective of the initial triage, equipment can be migrated from the
OEM to direct on-site maintenance over time, as scientists become
comfortable with the performance of the on-site team. Equipment usually
transitions to on-site engineer maintenance by means of the frontline
model, which gives the on-site team the opportunity to hone their
skills before taking on full maintenance responsibility.
Cost savings realized with the triage model will be a combination of
those described with asset management (15–20%) and on-site engineer
(20–25%), depending on how equipment is split between the two models.
Service quality for equipment maintained by the on-site team will be
the highest, as described previously. Transition to the more efficient
on-site model over time releases further costs savings (typically 5–7%)
and improves service quality for a greater percentage of equipment,
protecting the maintenance solution from demands for further cost
savings in subsequent years.
Summary
Cost reduction is a driving force in the pharmaceutical industry, but
companies should not forget the critical role maintenance plays in
generating high-quality results that get their products to market
faster. Reducing quality to achieve savings will increase costs
elsewhere. Fortunately, new maintenance models focused on efficiency
improvements can deliver both cost savings and enhanced service
quality. PT