Jim
Miller is president of PharmSource Information Services, Inc., and
publisher of Bio/Pharmaceutical Outsourcing Report, tel. 703.383.4903,
fax 703.383.4905, info@pharmsource.com, www.pharmsource.com
The pharmaceutical outsourcing industry is well into its
second year of very strong growth, and indications appear that it will
enjoy a healthy third year as well.
Most publicly traded CROs and CMOs enjoyed revenue growth exceeding 10%
in the first half of the year and announced even greater profit
increases. Among contractors that participated in the 2005
PharmSource–Pharmaceutical Technology1 outsourcing
survey—including a large portion of private companies that don't
report publicly—more than 60% said their revenues will increase 10%
or more in 2005. More than a quarter of the companies surveyed expect
their revenues will increase more than 20%. Half of pharmaceutical
company respondents said their contract services spending will grow 10%
or more this year.
The prospects for 2006 look positive as well. Pharmaceutical company
respondents to the PharmSource–Pharmaceutical Technology outsourcing
survey expect that contract services spending will grow in 2006 at the
same rate as 2005. In the meantime, major CROs are building record
backlogs of future studies to be conducted over the next 2–3 years.
In the midst of this good fortune, CRO and CMO executives must ask
themselves: Are we enjoying a periodic upswing in the business cycle,
or are we benefiting from a fundamental and long-term shift in how
pharmaceutical companies do business? The answer will have a big effect
on how they run their operations and the kind of investments they make
in coming months.
Determining whether we are at a high point in a business cycle is a
tough call because the pharmaceutical contract services industry is too
young to track its business cycles. Certainly, the last 10 years have
had some cyclical characteristics including a relative strength in the
second half of the 1990s, a slowdown during the 2000–2003 period,
and an upswing over the past two years.
This contract services cycle has been closely correlated with two other
industry developments that also tend to be cyclical: the strength of
the new product pipeline and the availability of funding for
early-stage companies. These cycles turned up in 2003, and the contract
services industry improved in lockstep. But now, the cycles are giving
mixed messages.
After a strong run in 2003–2004, funding for early-stage companies
has dropped in 2005. According to statistics compiled by Dow Jones
VentureOne, the first quarter of 2005 saw the second lowest volume of
venture capital flowing into biopharmaceutical companies in nearly five
years. In addition, the window of opportunity for initial public
offerings closed in the first quarter after having been open from late
2003 through 2004.
The soft financing environment comes at a critical time. Venture-backed
companies must raise new money every 18–24 months, so companies that
raised money in 2003 and 2004 must now replenish those funds.
Early-stage companies spend what they raise quickly and outsource a
high percentage of what they spend, so their funding problems could
hurt the CRO and CMO industry in coming months.
The news is much better regarding the new product pipeline. The flow of
new candidates appears to be very healthy, judging by the number of
candidates reported in various pipeline databases and the
pronouncements of pharmaceutical executives about the improving yields
of their research and development programs. Further evidence that the
demand is strong include the lengthening lead times for booking
preclinical and Phase I research capacity at CROs, and the mounting
backlogs for Phase II/III studies.
The robust pipeline is a function of maturing science and re-engineered
organizational processes. These structural improvements should
have long-term positive implications for contract services, because
they can provide a steady flow of new candidates for years to come. A
financing shortage could hurt the flow of candidates coming from small
companies, however. (continued)