Manufacturers Face New Challenges Battling Global Threats
Washington Report
Manufacturers Face New Challenges Battling Global Threats
Jill
Wechsler is Pharmaceutical Technology's Washington editor, 7715 Rocton
Ave., Chevy Chase, MD 20815, tel. 301.656.4634, jwechsler@advanstar.com
Although new drug development usually focuses on clinical and
preclinical research, moving innovative products from clinical testing
to market mainly involves overcoming manufacturing capabilities and
production challenges. Ensuring access to consistently high-quality
critical vaccines and therapies needed to counter bioterrorism attacks
is a topic frequently debated. Product shortages are leading to
policies that expand US drug and vaccine manufacturing and ensure that
US regulatory and healthcare policies avoid erecting roadblocks to
high-quality drug production (see sidebar, "Signs of progress").
Warnings of a global flu pandemic and of bioterrorist attacks in the
next few years are increasing the focus on drug manufacturing. The
World Health Organization (WHO) advises that the avian flu virus is
likely to mutate and spread to humans, which could kill millions
worldwide. Congress is weighing new "BioShield II" legislation to
spur the development of countermeasures to biological threats and to
fight infectious diseases. Such crises would stress national healthcare
systems as well as international capacity to produce needed vaccines
and medicines. Government agencies are looking to encourage research
and development of new vaccines and other drugs to protect and treat
influenza patients, a process which would involve new methods for
testing and producing great quantities of new treatments.
A key issue is whether the United States has sufficient capacity to
produce vaccines and medical treatments needed to meet domestic needs
in the event of a health emergency, particularly a global pandemic.
This past year's flu vaccine shortage, precipitated by manufacturing
problems at Chiron's United Kingdom vaccine production facility,
focused national attention on vaccine quality control and regulation.
Federal officials also acknowledge that in the case of a global flu
pandemic, foreign governments very likely would curb exports of
vaccines and drugs to the United States until the needs of local
populations are met. Some manufacturers are looking to expand US
production capacity of critical drugs and are developing more-efficient
production methods for vaccines, but such undertakings are expensive
and may take several years to accomplish.
Seeking more antivirals
To prepare for a potential global influenza crisis in the near future,
the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) plans to finalize its
Pandemic Influenza Preparedness and Response Plan by fall. In the wake
of this past year's highly disruptive flu vaccine shortage, plus
regular supply problems with routine children's vaccines,
policymakers are very nervous about how the nation will deal with such
a global health crisis.
A major flu pandemic would increase demand for medications to treat
patients stricken by influenza, particularly during the period when
vaccines are under production. At the forefront of this effort is
rising international demand for Roche's antiviral Tamiflu
(oseltamivir), which was approved by the US Food and Drug
Administration and recommended by WHO for influenza treatment. In 2003,
more than 1 million prescriptions were written in the United States for
this neuraminidase inhibitor, which prevents flu virus replication.
Roche reports that foreign governments are ordering millions of doses
of Tamiflu for national stockpiles. The company is urging the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other US agencies to
follow suit or face shortages in the case of an international
emergency.
Last-minute orders will be difficult to fill because Tamiflu involves a
complex manufacturing process that takes 8–12 months to progress
from raw material to finished product, explained Roche Medical Director
Dominick Iacuzio at a hearing in May before the House Energy and
Commerce Committee on pandemic preparedness. The production process
involves many intermediate steps, including use of a unique starting
material and "a potentially explosive production step that may be
carried out only in specialized and costly facilities," Iacuzio
pointed out.
Roche doubled production capacity at its European facility in 2004 and
plans to increase production in 2006. One initiative would expand US
output by shipping active ingredient to US manufacturing sites to
produce finished drug product. In the United States, Roche also is
adopting special packaging for stockpiled Tamiflu to extend expiration
dating. These plans, though, may be blocked if Gilead Sciences follows
through on its June announcement to end its 10-year licensing agreement
with Roche for Tamiflu manufacturing and marketing.
Meanwhile, Roche is advocating an increased Tamiflu order from HHS,
which so far has purchased only 2.3 million courses of Tamiflu, enough
to treat less than 1% of the US population. Other nations are
stockpiling enough of the drug to cover up to 40% of their populations.
Without further purchase commitments, the manufacturer might find
itself in the uncomfortable position during a global pandemic of having
to export Tamiflu to countries with advance orders.
The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) recommends that the
United States stockpile antivirals sufficient to treat 50% of the
nation's population. It notes the need to support the development of
antiviral production capacity in the United States as well as a
strategy for distributing antivirals and vaccines to states, local
health departments, and points of care. CDC is enhancing systems for
monitoring adults hospitalized with influenza to detect signs of
resistance to current antiviral drugs and to guide its policy for
distributing scarce supplies of these medications.
The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) is
supporting research on new antivirals to precisely target viral
proteins and to inhibit their functions as well as studies of new
broad-spectrum therapeutics that might work against many influenza
virus strains. IDSA points out that such innovation could be important
in light of the potential for a pandemic influenza strain to become
resistant to Tamiflu. (continued)